Journal Home
Search for

Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 319-324 (May 2010)


View previous. 17 of 19 View next.

A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy

James H. KocsisaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Andrew J. Gerberb, Barbara Milroda, Steven P. Rooseb, Jacques Barberc, Michael E. Thasec, Patrick Perkinsa, Andrew C. Leona

published online 31 August 2009.

Abstract 

Context

In 2004, the American Psychiatric Association's Committee on Research on Psychiatric Treatments appointed a subcommittee to investigate the status of empirical evidence with regard to psychodynamic psychotherapy.

Objective

As a part of this effort, the committee developed a rating scale designed to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapy.

Data Sources

A 25-item RCT of Psychotherapy Quality Rating Scale was generated by expert consensus. Interrater reliability, internal consistency, and validity testing were undertaken using 7 trained raters.

Study Selection

A PubMed search was conducted to locate all RCTs of psychotherapies identified by their authors as being “psychodynamic” or “psychoanalytic” in origin and implementation.

Data Extraction

A total of 69 RCTs were independently rated by 2 raters.

Data Synthesis

The scale was found to have good interrater reliability (total score intraclass correlation = 0.76), internal consistency (Cronbach α = .87), and external validity.

Conclusions

This scale establishes a new standard for the design and execution of psychotherapy RCTs and provides a systematic empirical method for evaluating the quality of published RCTs.

a Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA

b Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA

c Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 212 7465913; fax: +1 212 7465913.

 Previous presentation: Portions of this work were presented at the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting, May 22, 2006, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and the American Psychoanalytic Association 2006 Winter Meeting. January 13, 2006, New York, NY.

PII: S0010-440X(09)00081-9

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.07.001


View previous. 17 of 19 View next.