Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Prevalence and correlates of fire-setting in the United States: results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

Michael G. VaughnaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Qiang Fub, Matt DeLisic, John Paul Wrightd, Kevin M. Beavere, Brian E. Perronf, Matthew O. Howardg

published online 13 July 2009.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Fire-setting is a serious and costly form of antisocial behavior. Our objective in this study was to examine the prevalence and correlates of intentional fire-setting behavior in the United States. Data were derived from a nationally representative sample of US residents 18 years and older. Structured psychiatric interviews (N = 43 093) were completed by trained lay interviewers between 2001 and 2002. Fire-setting as well as mood, anxiety, substance use, and personality disorders of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition were assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) version. The prevalence of lifetime fire-setting in the US population was 1.0%. Respondents who were men, white, 18 to 35 years old, born in the United States, and living in the western region of the United States had significantly higher rates of fire-setting than their counterparts. Fire-setting was significantly associated with a wide range of antisocial behaviors. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified strong associations between lifetime alcohol and marijuana use disorders, conduct disorder, antisocial and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders, and family history of antisocial behavior. Intentional illicit fire-setting behavior is associated with a broad array of antisocial behaviors and psychiatric comorbidities. Given the substantial personal and social costs related to arson, prevention and treatment interventions targeting fire-setters potentially could save lives and property.

a School of Social Work and Department of Community Health, Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA

b Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA

c Criminology and Criminal Justice Studies, Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

d Division of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

e College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

f School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

g School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tegeler Hall, St. Louis, MO 63103. Tel.: +1 314 977 2718; fax: +1 314 977 2731.

PII: S0010-440X(09)00073-X

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.06.002