Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 50, Issue 6 , Pages 549-555, November 2009

Is there a measurement overlap between depressive symptoms and quality of life?

  • Neusa Sica da Rocha

      Affiliations

    • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Psychiatry-UFRGS, Brazil
    • Graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Psychiatry-UFRGS, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Avenida Ramiro Barcelos, 2350 4° andar, Psychiatric Service, Porto Alegre-RS CEP 90003-035, Brazil. Tel.: +51 21018413.
  • ,
  • Mick J. Power

      Affiliations

    • Section of Health and Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Donald M. Bushnell

      Affiliations

    • Health Research Associates
  • ,
  • Marcelo P. Fleck

      Affiliations

    • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Psychiatry-UFRGS, Brazil
    • Department of Psychiatry and Legal Medicine-UFRGS, Brazil

published online 12 March 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Previous studies found that depression is associated with a broad impairment in quality of life (QOL). This finding might be associated to a measurement overlap.

Methods

The objective of this study was to verify whether the items of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF), a measure of generic QOL, are invariant among patients having a current major depressive episode who come from primary care services. We investigated data from primary care services from the 6 countries (Australia, Brazil, Israel, Russia, Spain, and the United States) involved in the baseline sample of the Longitudinal Investigation of Depression Outcomes. The Rasch model was used to analyze items exhibiting differential item functioning (DIF) as a way of assessing invariance in relation to a depression factor defined by the diagnosis of depression using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. In addition, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) score was correlated with the item and domain scores of the WHOQOL-BREF using the Pearson coefficient.

Results

The sample consisted of 2359 subjects, of which 1193 had a confirmed diagnosis of a current major depressive episode. Of the 26 items of the WHOQOL-BREF, 11 showed DIF due to the depression factor, and the physical domain presented more items displaying DIF. All Pearson coefficients between the WHOQOL-BREF item and domain scores and the CES-D score were weak and moderate (r = −0.13 to r = 0.43).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that most WHOQOL-BREF items do not exhibit DIF for a current major depressive episode and the variance associated with depression in this generic QOL measure is restricted to some facets of this construct. Thus, we recommend this restricted adjustment for depression in future analyses of this measure. Furthermore, our study indicates that researchers must measure QOL regardless of depression severity.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-440X(08)00185-5

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.11.015

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 50, Issue 6 , Pages 549-555, November 2009