Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 453-462, September 2009

Treatment response in psychotic patients classified according to social and clinical needs, drug side effects, and previous treatment; a method to identify functional remission

  • Malin Alenius

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
    • Apoteket AB, 118 81 Stockholm, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Apoteket AB, 118 81 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel.: +46 8 4661512.
  • ,
  • Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
  • ,
  • Per Hartvig

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Section of Pharmacokinetics, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Staffan Sundquist

      Affiliations

    • Apoteket Qulturum, 551 20 Jönköping, Sweden
  • ,
  • Leif Lindström

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden

published online 19 January 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Various approaches have been made over the years to classify psychotic patients according to inadequate treatment response, using terms such as treatment resistant or treatment refractory. Existing classifications have been criticized for overestimating positive symptoms; underestimating residual symptoms, negative symptoms, and side effects; or being to open for individual interpretation. The aim of this study was to present and evaluate a new method of classification according to treatment response and, thus, to identify patients in functional remission.

Method

A naturalistic, cross-sectional study was performed using patient interviews and information from patient files. The new classification method CANSEPT, which combines the Camberwell Assessment of Need rating scale, the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser side effect rating scale (SE), and the patient's previous treatment history (PT), was used to group the patients according to treatment response. CANSEPT was evaluated by comparison of expected and observed results.

Results

In the patient population (n = 123), the patients in functional remission, as defined by CANSEPT, had higher quality of life, fewer hospitalizations, fewer psychotic symptoms, and higher rate of workers than those with the worst treatment outcome.

Conclusion

In the evaluation, CANSEPT showed validity in discriminating the patients of interest and was well tolerated by the patients. CANSEPT could secure inclusion of correct patients in the clinic or in research.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This research was funded by the National Corporation for Swedish Pharmacies (Apoteket AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which was the employer of Malin Alenius, Staffan Sundquist, and Per Hartvig at the time of the study. Apoteket AB had no further role in the study. All authors declare no conflict of interest that would inflict on the present study. The statistical analyses were performed by Malin Alenius, with support from Niclas Ericsson at the Uppsala Clinical Research Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.

PII: S0010-440X(08)00167-3

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.11.001

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 453-462, September 2009