Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 48, Issue 2 , Pages 161-169, March 2007

Sex differences in Cloninger's temperament dimensions—a meta-analysis

  • Jouko Miettunen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Oulu University and Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +358 8 3156923; fax: +358 8 333167.
  • ,
  • Juha Veijola

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Oulu University and Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
    • Research Council for Health, Academy of Finland, FIN-00501 Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • Erika Lauronen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Oulu University and Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
  • ,
  • Liisa Kantojärvi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Oulu University and Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
  • ,
  • Matti Joukamaa

      Affiliations

    • Social Psychiatry Unit, Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, FIN-33014 Tampere, Finland
    • Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, FIN-33380 Tampere, Finland

published online 02 January 2007.

Abstract 

There have been many comparisons between men and women on psychological characteristics and personality. The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire and Temperament and Character Inventory developed by Cloninger are used to measure the following temperament dimensions: novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, and persistence. Studies using these scales in healthy (nonclinical) populations have reported varying results on sex differences, but there is no meta-analysis of the topic. In this study, meta-analytic methods were used to estimate sex differences in these temperament dimensions and to study the effect of mean age of the sample and location of the study (Asia/other) on possible differences. Studies on healthy populations were systematically collected; the required minimum sample size was 100. The search resulted in 32 eligible studies. Consequently, women scored higher in reward dependence (pooled effect size; Cohen's d = −0.63; z test, P value < .001) and harm avoidance (d = −0.33; P < .001). There were no differences in novelty seeking (d = −0.04; P = .29) or in persistence (d = −0.02; P = .62). The sex difference in reward dependence was significantly smaller in Asian studies. This study was the first one to pool studies on sex differences in Cloninger's temperament dimensions. Women scored consistently higher in harm avoidance in the studies included. Together with similar sex difference found in related traits (eg, depression), this finding supports the validity of this temperament dimension. The given data on sex differences should be taken into account in future studies using these instruments.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-440X(06)00125-8

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.10.007

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 48, Issue 2 , Pages 161-169, March 2007