Journal Home
Search for

Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 361-367 (September 2005)


View previous. 11 of 16 View next.

A latent structure analysis of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Narcissistic Personality Disorder criteria

Andrea FossatiaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Theodore P. Beauchaineb, Federica Graziolia, Ilaria Carrettaa, Francesca Cortinovisa, Cesare Maffeia

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to examine the latent structure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) criteria in a group of 641 outpatients. The consecutively admitted outpatients were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders, Version 2.0, and the Personality Questionnaire. Both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses (CFA and EFA, respectively) were used to evaluate whether the NPD criteria measure a single latent trait. Latent class analysis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the individual DSM-IV NPD criteria. Mean above minus below a cut (MAMBAC) and maximum covariance (MAXCOV) taxometric analyses were used to evaluate whether the latent distribution of the DSM-IV NPD features is actually discrete.

Both CFA and EFA results showed that the 9 DSM-IV NPD criteria loaded on 2 correlated factors. The latent class analysis results suggested a 3-class solution for NPD criteria; relevant differences in diagnostic efficiency were observed among the NPD criteria. MAMBAC and MAXCOV analyses provided consistent evidence of taxonic (ie, discrete) latent structure for NPD.

This study gave only partial support to the validity of the DSM-IV NPD construct. Taxometric analyses indicated that a typological model is appropriate for describing NPD, but CFA and EFA suggested the existence of 2 distinct—albeit correlated—clusters of narcissistic features. As a whole, the DSM-IV criteria discriminated NPD from other personality disorders, but diagnostic accuracy statistics did not replicate the rank order of diagnostic efficiency of NPD criteria proposed by the DSM-IV.

a Department of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20127, Italy

b Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1525, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 02 2643 3241; fax: +39 02 2643 3408.

PII: S0010-440X(04)00201-9

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.11.006


View previous. 11 of 16 View next.