Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 46, Issue 3 , Pages 223-228, May 2005

Reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale in phobic disorders

  • David Mataix-Cols

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 20 7188 7188x80189; fax: +44 20 7188 0184.
  • ,
  • Amy J. Cowley

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
  • ,
  • Matthew Hankins

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
  • ,
  • Andreas Schneider

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College of Science, London W6 8RP, UK
  • ,
  • Martin Bachofen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College of Science, London W6 8RP, UK
  • ,
  • Mark Kenwright

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College of Science, London W6 8RP, UK
  • ,
  • Lina Gega

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College of Science, London W6 8RP, UK
  • ,
  • Rachel Cameron

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College of Science, London W6 8RP, UK
  • ,
  • Isaac M. Marks

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
    • Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College of Science, London W6 8RP, UK

Abstract 

The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a simple widely used 5-item measure of disability whose psychometric properties need more analysis in phobic disorders. The reliability, factor structure, validity, and sensitivity to change of the WSAS were studied in 205 phobic patients (73 agoraphobia, 62 social phobia, and 70 specific phobia) who participated in various open and randomized trials of self-exposure therapy. Internal consistency of the WSAS was excellent in all phobics pooled and in agoraphobics and social phobics separately. Principal components analysis extracted a single general factor of disability. Specific phobics gave less consistent ratings across WSAS items, suggesting that some items were less relevant to their problem. Internal consistency was marginally higher for self-ratings than clinician ratings of the WSAS. Self-ratings and clinician ratings correlated highly though patients tended to rate themselves as more disabled than clinicians did. WSAS total scores reflected differences in phobic severity and improvement with treatment. The WSAS is a valid, reliable, and change-sensitive measure of work/social and other adjustment in phobic disorders, especially in agoraphobia and social phobia.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-440X(04)00138-5

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.08.007

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 46, Issue 3 , Pages 223-228, May 2005