Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 63-68, January 2006

Coping styles of type I and type II alcohol-dependent men undergoing treatment

  • George Moussas

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Unit of Alcoholic Patients, Psychiatric Hospital of Attica, Dafni 12462, Greece
  • ,
  • Georgia Dandouti

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Unit of Alcoholic Patients, Psychiatric Hospital of Attica, Dafni 12462, Greece
  • ,
  • Alexander Botsis

      Affiliations

    • University Mental Health Research Institute, Athens 15601, Greece
  • ,
  • Lefteris Lykouras

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Athens University Medical School, “Eginition” Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece
    • Department of General Hospital Psychiatry, Athens University Medical School, “Attikon” Hospital, Athens 12462, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of General Hospital Psychiatry, Athens University Medical School, “Attikon” Hospital, 124 62 Athens, Greece. Tel.: +30 1210 5831000; fax: +30 1210 5326453.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to investigate the ways by which individuals with alcohol dependence, who were subgrouped into type I and type II according to the typology criteria of von Knorring et al, (J. Study Alcohol. 1987;48:523-527), cope with life events. One hundred male alcohol-dependent individuals participating in a therapeutic program composed the study sample. Of the 100, 61 subjects were categorized as type I and 39 subjects as type II. Coping styles were measured using a self-administered questionnaire that includes 8 subscales of coping styles. The type II subgroup scored significantly lower on the suppression subscale and significantly higher on the replacement, mapping, and substitution subscales as compared with the type I subgroup, of which the latter difference was at a tendency level. As regards the remaining 4 coping style subscales, minimization, help seeking, blame, and reversal, no significant differences were found between the 2 patient subgroups. The differences found may be taken into account in the development of therapeutic programs for the 2 subgroups.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-440X(04)00106-3

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.018

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 63-68, January 2006