Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 45, Issue 6 , Pages 483-494, November 2004

Italian version of the defense style questionnaire

  • Pietro San Martini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy
    • McGill University and Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Pietro San Martini, Dipartimento di Psicologia Dinamica e Clinica Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy
  • ,
  • Paolo Roma

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy
    • McGill University and Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Sara Sarti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy
    • McGill University and Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Vittorio Lingiardi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy
    • McGill University and Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Michael Bond

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy
    • McGill University and Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada

Abstract 

The Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) assesses defensive behavior by empirically evaluating conscious derivatives of defense and coping mechanisms in everyday life. It was developed on the assumption that defenses can be ordered along a maturity-immaturity continuum and tend to group into clusters, or defensive styles. The original factor analytical study, by Bond et al. (1983) identified four styles, called maladaptive, image-distorting, self-sacrifice, and adaptive styles. Successive studies only partially confirmed this factor structure. We present the factor structure and the main psychometric features of the Italian version of the questionnaire. The DSQ was translated into Italian by the back-translation method and administered to a sample of 294 men (mean age, 33.33 years) and 333 women (mean age, 32.38 years). An exploratory factor analysis identified three factors largely corresponding to Bond’s maladaptive, image-distorting, and adaptive defensive styles and to analogous factors identified by other authors. Accordingly, three defense style scales were constructed, containing respectively 37, 17, and 12 items. These scales showed intercorrelations compatible with the hierarchical model of defensive functioning at the base of the questionnaire, acceptable, though ameliorable, test-retest reliabilities (r’s = .79, .63, and .81, respectively) and, with the exception of the Adaptive Style scale, sufficient internal consistencies (alphas: .85, .72, .57). However, only the Maladaptive Style scale, probably due to its greater length, showed values of reliability and internal consistency high enough to warrant clinical use in its present form. Further investigation is required to find new items that may improve the reliability of the Image-Distorting and the Adaptive Style scales.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-440X(04)00092-6

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.012

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 45, Issue 6 , Pages 483-494, November 2004