Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 45, Issue 4 , Pages 268-274, July 2004

Adjustment to antidepressant utilization rates to account for depression in remission

  • Cynthia A. Beck

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Cynthia A. Beck, M.D., M.A.Sc., Department of Psychiatry, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9 Canada
  • ,
  • Scott B. Patten

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

Abstract 

Conventional estimates of antidepressant (AD) utilization in major depressive syndrome (MDS) have been low, but this may be partially because ongoing AD use by individuals with resolved MDS is not included. Valid estimates of AD utilization should include this ongoing use for MDS, but this is difficult since most surveys do not collect data on the reason for taking ADs. Only a proportion (fdep) of the nondepressed (nMDS) population taking ADs does so for depression. Published studies have not reported this proportion, and data required to estimate fdep are not usually available from surveys. The current study was performed to (1) estimate fdep by employing information on past history of depression, and (2) use the estimate to obtain an “adjusted” AD utilization rate, including resolved MDS subjects taking ADs. Data were collected in Calgary in 1998 and 1999 by random-digit dial telephone interview from consenting adults aged 18+ years. MDS was assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form for Major Depression (CIDI-SFMD). Data were gathered on current medications, past depression, and current chronic physical illness. Of 2,542 respondents, 17.1% had MDS as defined by the CIDI-SFMD. A total of 20.2% of MDS and 3.2% of nMDS subjects were taking ADs. Of nMDS individuals taking ADs, 70.6% reported past depression (fdep = 70.6%). An “adjusted” AD utilization rate including this group was 28.2%. Physical illnesses that can be treated with ADs affected only 30.0% of nMDS subjects without past depression taking ADs. This study suggests that most individuals without active depression taking ADs do so for depression. AD utilization rates that ignore this group may be unrealistically low. AD use among nMDS subjects without previous depression is probably not primarily for physical illnesses. Limitations include the use of a brief predictive instrument for MDS, and self-report of past depression.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a Clinical Fellowship in Health Research, Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (C.A.B.). S.B.P. is a Fellow with the Institute of Health Economics.

PII: S0010-440X(04)00039-2

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.03.003

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 45, Issue 4 , Pages 268-274, July 2004