Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 213-218, May 2004

Patient characteristics and diagnostic discrepancy in first-episode psychosis

  • Olli Kampman

      Affiliations

    • University of Tampere, Medical School, Tampere, Finland
    • Tampere Community Mental Health Care Center, Tampere, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Olli Kampman, M.D., University of Tampere, Medical School, FIN-33014 University of Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Päivi Kiviniemi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Elina Koivisto

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Juha Väänänen

      Affiliations

    • Ylöjärvi Community Mental Health Care Center, Ylöjärvi, Finland
  • ,
  • Nina Kilkku

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Esa Leinonen

      Affiliations

    • University of Tampere, Medical School, Tampere, Finland
    • Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Klaus Lehtinen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

Abstract 

Despite the operational criteria in diagnostic systems there is still marked diversity between clinical and research diagnoses in populations with psychotic disorders. The objective of the current study was to explore the association of patient-related factors with diagnostic agreement between clinical diagnoses and Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN-2) diagnoses in first-episode psychosis. The sample included 80 consecutive patients. As explanatory variables we used demographic characteristics (gender, age, living circumstances, education, and social activities), measures of psychopathology (Positive and Negative Symptom scale [PANSS], Hamilton Depression Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning Scale [GAF], and Strauss-Carpenter Scale), duration of untreated psychosis, and diagnostic category according to SCAN-2 interview. The overall agreement value between the clinical and research diagnoses was 0.55 (kappa). In the whole sample low scores on the PANSS negative subscale, low level of education, and high score on the PANSS item for delusions predicted diagnostic discrepancy. Acute and transient psychotic disorder as a research diagnosis predicted diagnostic agreement. In the schizophrenia group, young age and lack of social activities predicted diagnostic agreement. Bivariate comparisons of treatment compliance, perceived medication side effects, or negative attitudes towards treatment showed no associations with diagnostic agreement. The results confirm some of the findings in the few previous studies. The diagnosis of schizophrenia is likely to be delayed and there is a need for further education with clinicians in recognizing the symptoms of schizophrenia.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-440X(04)00017-3

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.02.002

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 213-218, May 2004