Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 45, Issue 2 , Pages 83-87, March 2004

Retrospective review of treatment retention in pathological gambling

  • Jon E Grant

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Jon E. Grant, J.D., M.D., Department of Psychiatry, Brown University, 345 Blackstone Blvd, Providence, RI 02906, USA
  • ,
  • Suck Won Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • ,
  • Michael Kuskowski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Abstract 

Although research on pathological gambling is increasing, there are few studies examining correlates of treatment retention. In the current study, 50 outpatients with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of pathological gambling treated in a clinical practice were assessed by chart review. Standard scales were used to rate subjects at baseline and at 2-month intervals. Subjects who dropped out of treatment were contacted by telephone to determine reasons for discontinuation of treatment. The mean duration of follow-up was 360.4 ± 352.2 days. Twenty-four (48%) of the subjects discontinued treatment, including 14 (36.8%) of those subjects who were responders (defined as Clinical Global Impression [CGI] scale of “very much” or “much” improved) during at least one assessment point. Of those who discontinued treatment, 41.7% reported missing the thrill of gambling and 20.8% reported feeling certain that they could win and relieve financial burdens. Predictors of treatment continuation were responding to treatment within 8 weeks (odds ratio [OR], 6.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 32.00; P = .04) and having a supportive environment (OR, 22.99; 95% CI, 5.04 to 104.76; P < .001). We conclude that a large percentage of patients with pathological gambling discontinue treatment. Predictors of treatment continuation may have clinical importance. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to further elucidate the course of pathological gambling.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-440X(03)00219-0

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2003.12.005

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 45, Issue 2 , Pages 83-87, March 2004