Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 472-482, November 2003

Factor analysis of the catatonia rating scale and catatonic symptom distribution across four diagnostic groups

  • Stephanie Krüger

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Stephanie Krüger, M.D., Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universitätsklinik Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
    • Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universitätsklinik Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
  • ,
  • R.Michael Bagby

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Westf. Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Neurologie, University of Witten/Herdecke, Gütersloh, Germany
  • ,
  • Jürgen Höffler

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Peter Bräunig

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Psychiatry, Verhaltensmedizin und Psychosomatik am Klinikum Chemnitz, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Abstract 

Catatonia is a frequent psychomotor syndrome, which has received increasing recognition over the last decade. The assessment of the catatonic syndrome requires systematic rating scales that cover the complex spectrum of catatonic motor signs and behaviors. The Catatonia Rating Scale (CRS) is such an instrument, which has been validated and which has undergone extensive reliability testing. In the present study, to further validate the CRS, the items composing this scale were submitted to principal components factor extraction followed by a varimax rotation. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess group differences on the extracted factors in patients with schizophrenia, pure mania, mixed mania, and major depression (N = 165). Four factors were extracted, which accounted for 71.5% of the variance. The factors corresponded to the clinical syndromes of (1) catatonic excitement, (2) abnormal involuntary movements/mannerisms, (3) disturbance of volition/catalepsy, and (4) catatonic inhibition. The ANOVA revealed that each of the groups showed a distinctive catatonic symptom pattern and that the overlap between diagnostic groups was minimal. We conclude that this four-factor symptom structure of catatonia challenges the current conceptualization, which proposes only two symptom subtypes.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-440X(03)00108-1

doi:10.1016/S0010-440X(03)00108-1

Comprehensive Psychiatry
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 472-482, November 2003