Differences in DSM-III-R and DSM-IV diagnoses in eating disorder patients☆

Abstract 

Two hundred eighty-eight eating disorder patients were administered the DSM-III-R Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) and the DSM-IV SCID for axis I and II. Concordance between DSM-III-R and DSM-IV was excellent for the axis I affective and anxiety disorders, bulimia nervosa, and substance abuse/dependence. It was also excellent for axis II paranoid, schizoid, borderline, and antisocial personality disorders. Agreement between the two nosological systems was lower for alcohol abuse/dependence with a kappa of .63. Kappas were also poor for the following personality disorders: schizotypal (.44), histrionic (.29), dependent (.54), obsessive-compulsive (.62) and not otherwise specified (.63). There was a substantial difference in the diagnosis of anorexia nervosa between DSM-III-R and DSM-IV. Fourteen patients were diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, binge/purge type, using DSM-IV criteria, while only six received the diagnoses of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa using DSM-III-R criteria. Kappa was .49 and the percent agreement was 79%. While there are considerable areas of overlap in DSM-IV and DSM-III-R, there are also areas of substantial differences. Clinicians and researchers must be very cautious when attempting to compare data from the different nosologies.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.